Home > Picking a Corporate Vehicle: Not Just a Matter of Taste
|
Ltd, LLP, CIC, CIO – the UK loves an acronym almost as much as it loves a well organised queue. But behind each of these lies a different type of legal structure, each with its own quirks, perks and pitfalls. Picking the right one isn’t just a box-ticking exercise for your lawyer – it’s structural engineering for your entire business, shaping everything from who calls the shots to how you raise capital (and explain things to the taxman).
If you’re setting up shop – whether it’s a tech-driven startup, a social enterprise, or your gran’s jam empire – here’s your guide to the main corporate forms under English law.
The household name of the business world. The trusty Ltd.
This is the go-to structure for most trading companies, from cosy family businesses to multinational giants. It’s flexible, familiar to investors, and well-understood by regulators. The big idea is simple: shareholders contribute capital in return for shares, and their liability is limited to the amount unpaid on those shares (which, in most cases, is nada).
There are two main types:
Why is it everyone’s favourite? Because you can:
If you want to grow, attract investors, or eventually list on a stock exchange, this is your best bet.
Investors like it, lawyers understand it, and Companies House knows exactly what to do with it. Hard to argue with that.
No shareholders, no share capital, no profit distributions. This is the structure of choice for not-for-profits, clubs, and associations – the sorts who throw around phrases like “community reinvestment” and “public good” rather than “dividend yield”.
Members promise to cough up a token amount (usually £1) if the company is wound up, but that’s it. No dividends, no equity, no fancy options packages.
You’ll see these used by charities, housing associations, and arts organisations. Think more “stewards” than “owners” – the focus here is mission, not margin.
Rare, mysterious, and a little bit dangerous.
An unlimited company doesn’t offer limited liability to its shareholders – they’re on the hook for all the company’s debts. Sounds bonkers in a world built on limited risk, right?
So why do they exist?
Not recommended unless you have a very specific reason, a very high-risk tolerance, and possibly a family trust or two.
LLPs aren’t technically companies – they’re partnerships with a legal personality. That means the LLP itself can own assets and enter into contracts, but its members enjoy limited liability.
No shares here. Instead, everything – profits, governance, capital – is governed by the LLP agreement. Which, if drafted properly, can be a beautiful (and highly flexible) thing.
They’re popular with:
Bonus point: LLPs are tax transparent. The LLP doesn’t pay corporation tax – each member is taxed individually on their slice of the pie.
Downside? Not so great for raising equity from outsiders. You can’t issue shares, so traditional investors often steer clear. Brilliant for partners. Trickier for pitching to pension funds.
Want to run a business and do some good in the world? Step right up.
CICs are designed for social enterprises. They can be limited by shares or guarantee, but they must pass a “community interest test” and have something called an asset lock – a sort of legal chastity belt that stops you running off with the profits.
A CIC can pay dividends (if it’s share-based), but they’re capped and closely monitored. You’re allowed to make a living, not a fortune.
It’s perfect for organisations that want to trade commercially but still wear their social mission on their sleeve. Think ethical trading companies, green energy projects, social care providers – all the wholesome stuff.
Newer on the scene, but increasingly popular with charities.
CIOs give you limited liability and legal personality without the hassle of registering with Companies House. You deal only with the Charity Commission – fewer forms, fewer headaches.
Only available to registered charities, so don’t get any entrepreneurial ideas here. If you’re not pursuing exclusively charitable purposes, it’s not for you.
Like picking a house, choosing a legal structure is all about what you need now – and what you’re planning to grow into. Bungalow or townhouse? Shareholder or trustee? Here’s what to consider:
Profit or Purpose?
Start with the basics: is your business meant to generate private profit or serve a public mission?
How Will You Raise Funds?
Think about where your capital is coming from.
Who’s in Charge?
Ownership and control don’t always go hand in hand – but they do need to be thought through.
Liability: What’s at Stake?
Most structures limit your personal risk.
Tax Position
Tax efficiency depends on how profits are made, shared and retained.
Public Perception and Regulation
Some structures come with reputational benefits – and added oversight.
Room to Grow
If the business is likely to change shape – take on new owners, restructure or exit – flexibility matters.
Legal structures rarely get the spotlight – but they quietly influence almost everything that follows. How a business raises money, takes on risk, distributes value and brings in new owners is all shaped by that early decision. It’s less about ticking boxes and more about defining your operating logic.
There’s no universally “best” model. A company limited by shares is often the right answer – but not always. A limited liability partnership might offer better tax efficiency or control. A Community Interest Company can embed a mission legally. And in some cases, what started as the simplest option may no longer match how the business actually works.
The trick is to choose deliberately. Understand what each structure does – and what it limits – before your investors, employees or regulator ask the same question.
If your legal structure sits quietly in the background while the business grows, funds flow, and no one’s shouting at Companies House – you’ve probably nailed it.
Stay updated with the latest insights and articles delivered to your inbox weekly.
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and expert advice
on funding structures.